In a pivotal scene from "The Big Short", Steve Carell's character sits in a restaurant, his face a mixture of confusion and dawning horror as he discusses CDOs with a CDO manager - a job title he didn't even realise existed. As the conversation unfolds, the true complexity and opacity of these financial instruments becomes painfully clear. It's a scene that encapsulates the complexity of pre-2008 financial instruments - and one that, surprisingly, has some parallels with today's world of legal tech and venture capital.
The evolution from CDO squared to SPV squared isn't just a matter of changing acronyms. It represents a shift in the industry's approach to complexity. While the financial world of 2008 seemed to revel in opacity, today's legal tech sector is striving for something different: simplification of complex structures.
However, it would be premature to declare victory over complexity just yet. The world of venture capital and legal tech remains a labyrinth of jargon, structures, and processes that can bewilder even seasoned professionals. The question remains: can technology truly simplify these intricate systems, or is it merely adding another layer of complexity?
To understand the full scope of this evolution, it's necessary to delve into the history of legal fees, explore the emerging field of 'legal engineering', and consider what the future might hold for startup funding. This journey through the landscape of legal tech and venture capital promises to be as complex as the systems it examines, but potentially just as rewarding.
The transformation of venture capital through legal tech is a story of innovation, adaptation, and the constant push-pull between complexity and simplification. It's a narrative that echoes the broader trends in technology and finance, where the goal is often to make the complex appear simple, even if the underlying structures remain as intricate as ever.
As the industry continues to evolve, one thing is certain: the intersection of legal expertise, technological innovation, and venture capital will continue to shape the future of how businesses are funded and grown. Whether this leads to a more transparent and efficient system, or simply shifts complexity from one area to another, remains to be seen.
This exploration will begin with a look at the history of legal fees, a topic that has long been a source of both necessity and consternation in the business world.
Written by: Andrew Mazalkov
A History of Legal Fees
Source: Legal Trends Report
The evolution of legal fees in the startup ecosystem is a critical aspect of understanding the current landscape. As Silicon Hills Lawyer points out, "It usually takes experience in the market for business people to truly understand the realities of hiring and working with lawyers." This sentiment underscores the importance of exploring the historical context of legal fees in the startup world.
Traditionally, legal services for startups were billed on an hourly basis, with rates varying significantly based on the lawyer's experience and the firm's prestige. However, this model often led to unpredictable costs for cash-strapped startups. As the startup ecosystem matured, alternative fee arrangements began to emerge.
The Fenwick & West Legal Resource Guide highlights that "Companies typically sell convertible preferred stock to venture investors at a substantial premium over the price charged to the founders or the seed investors." This practice has implications for legal fees, as the complexity of these transactions often requires more sophisticated legal work.
One significant shift in recent years has been the rise of fixed-fee arrangements for certain startup legal services. These packages often include company formation, initial stock issuances, and basic intellectual property protection. This trend towards predictability in legal costs has been driven by competition among law firms specialising in startup services and the increasing savviness of founders.
However, it's crucial to note that not all legal work can be effectively packaged into fixed-fee arrangements. The Silicon Hills Lawyer argues that "Flat fees don't 'align' incentives with your lawyers. They reverse them, often making them more dangerous." This perspective suggests that while fixed fees may provide cost certainty, they may not always be in the best interest of the startup.
A Cambridge Judge Business School startup pack emphasises the importance of budgeting for legal costs from the outset. It advises that startups should "set aside a budget for professional fees" and "be prepared to pay for quality advice." This approach recognises that while managing legal costs is important, attempting to cut corners on essential legal services can be detrimental in the long run.
As the startup ecosystem continues to evolve, so too does the landscape of legal fees. New models are emerging, such as subscription-based legal services and hybrid arrangements that combine elements of fixed fees and hourly billing. These innovations aim to provide startups with more flexible and tailored legal support while still offering some degree of cost predictability.
Understanding this history and the current trends in legal fees is crucial for startups navigating the complex world of legal services. It allows founders to make informed decisions about their legal spending, balancing the need for quality advice with the realities of limited budgets in the early stages of a company's life.
Legal Engineering
Typical Structure of an SPV. Source: PwC
The concept of 'legal engineering' has emerged as a crucial aspect of the modern startup ecosystem, particularly in the realm of venture capital and fundraising. Legal engineering involves the application of technology and innovative structures to streamline legal processes, reduce complexity, and create more efficient financial instruments. In the context of startups and venture capital, this often manifests in the form of sophisticated platforms that simplify the creation and management of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) and other financial structures.
Platforms Revolutionising Legal Engineering
Several platforms have emerged as leaders in this space, each offering unique solutions to the challenges faced by founders and investors:
Carta has become a household name in the startup world, offering a comprehensive suite of equity management tools. As noted by TechCrunch, "Carta has become the de facto standard for cap table management in the startup ecosystem." Their platform allows founders to:
Easily manage their cap table
Issue and track stock options
Facilitate 409A valuations
Create and manage SPVs
By automating many of these processes, Carta significantly reduces the legal and administrative burden on founders, allowing them to focus on growing their business.
Vauban, recently acquired by Carta, specialises in SPV and fund creation. According to their website, "Vauban enables VC firms and angel investors to raise funds and invest in startups quickly and efficiently." Their platform offers:
Quick SPV setup (as fast as 48 hours)
Automated legal documentation
Investor onboarding and KYC processes
Fund administration and reporting
This level of automation and speed is a game-changer for founders looking to quickly capitalise on investment opportunities.
Odin focuses on simplifying the investment process for venture capital firms and angel investors. Their platform provides:
Custom SPV creation
Automated investor updates
Digital signing of legal documents
Integration with popular tools like DocuSign and Dropbox
Benefits for Founders
These platforms are revolutionising the fundraising landscape for founders in several key ways:
Simplified Cap Table Management: As companies grow and take on more investors, cap tables can become incredibly complex. Platforms like Carta simplify this process, making it easier for founders to manage their equity and avoid costly mistakes.
Faster Fundraising: The ability to quickly set up SPVs through platforms like Vauban allows founders to capitalise on investment opportunities more rapidly. As the PWC report notes, "SPVs contribute to the efficient operation of the global financial markets by providing finance opportunities for a wide range of securities to meet investor demand."
Reduced Legal Costs: By automating many legal processes, these platforms can significantly reduce the need for expensive legal services. This is particularly beneficial for early-stage startups operating on tight budgets.
Improved Investor Relations: Tools that facilitate easy investor updates and reporting help founders maintain strong relationships with their investors, which can be crucial for future funding rounds.
Compliance and Transparency: These platforms often include features to help ensure compliance with relevant regulations, reducing legal risk for founders. As the Vestd guide points out, "Vestd Syndicates use a UK bare trust structure, which safeguards your SEIS/EIS eligibility."
The rise of legal engineering platforms like Carta, Vauban, and Odin marks a pivotal shift in the venture capital landscape, transforming the way founders and investors navigate the complexities of startup financing. These tools are not merely simplifying processes; they're fundamentally reshaping the ecosystem by democratising access to sophisticated financial instruments like SPVs. By automating intricate legal processes, providing real-time visibility into cap tables, and ensuring regulatory compliance, these platforms are addressing key challenges highlighted in the PWC report on SPVs, such as transparency and efficiency.
However, as we marvel at the power of these tools to cut through legal complexity, we must heed the report's warning about the need for a comprehensive understanding of the structures involved. The future of legal engineering in venture capital likely holds even more innovation, with potential for AI integration, blockchain adoption, and enhanced regulatory tech.
Yet, amidst this technological revolution, the human element remains crucial. These platforms, while powerful, are not a panacea; they're tools that empower founders and investors to make more informed decisions, faster. As the venture capital world continues to evolve, the true value of legal engineering will lie in its ability to strike a balance between reduction and sophistication, enabling a new generation of entrepreneurs to focus on what truly matters - building groundbreaking companies that shape our future.
The Future of Raising
As we look ahead, the future of fundraising in the venture capital world appears to be at an inflection point. The convergence of legal engineering, sophisticated financial instruments like SPVs, and the ongoing digital transformation of the industry is reshaping how startups access capital and how investors deploy it.
The evolution from complex, opaque structures like CDOs to more transparent and accessible tools like modern SPVs represents a significant shift in the industry's approach to financial engineering. However, this shift brings with it both opportunities and challenges.
On one hand, platforms like Carta, Vauban, and Odin are democratising access to sophisticated financial instruments, allowing a broader range of founders and investors to participate in the venture ecosystem. This democratisation could lead to a more diverse and dynamic startup landscape, with innovative ideas finding funding more easily than ever before.
On the other hand, the simplification of complex financial structures carries its own risks. As the PWC report on SPVs cautions, there's a danger in oversimplification. The report emphasises the importance of all parties developing "a comprehensive understanding of the structural behaviours and risks associated with these entities." This underscores a crucial point: while technology can make financial instruments more accessible, it doesn't negate the need for financial literacy and due diligence.
Looking forward, we can anticipate several trends shaping the future of fundraising:
Increased regulatory scrutiny: As SPVs and other alternative investment vehicles become more prevalent, regulators are likely to pay closer attention. This could lead to new compliance challenges, but also to greater standardisation and transparency in the industry.
AI and machine learning integration: Future platforms may leverage AI to provide more sophisticated risk assessment and investment recommendations, further streamlining the fundraising process.
Global expansion: As these tools prove their worth in major markets, we're likely to see increased adoption in emerging startup ecosystems worldwide, potentially levelling the playing field for founders outside traditional tech hubs.
Blockchain and tokenisation: The use of blockchain technology could enhance transparency and liquidity in private markets, potentially transforming how equity is distributed and traded.
Despite these adva ncements, the core principles of venture capital are likely to remain unchanged. The importance of strong founder-investor relationships, the value of strategic guidance, and the need for patient capital will continue to be crucial elements of the startup ecosystem.
In conclusion, the future of raising capital in the venture world is likely to be characterised by a delicate balance between technological innovation and human expertise. While platforms like Carta and Vauban are simplifying complex processes, they're not replacing the need for sound judgement and experienced guidance. Instead, they're enabling founders and investors to focus more on what truly matters: building and scaling innovative companies that can shape our future.
As we move forward, the challenge for the industry will be to harness the power of these new tools while maintaining the rigour and diligence that have always been hallmarks of successful venture investing. In this new landscape, those who can effectively blend technological sophistication with deep market understanding will be best positioned to thrive.
Comments